Indeed that everyone (or church) is entitled to their own opinion! What you can’t do is BE RIGHT. All rights reserved. For some, that pace may have been their very best. I just read this to my 16 year old son. If someone gets mad at you for working hard, odds are they aren’t going to get very far in life. How can I render judgment on something if I don’t know what is really meant by it? It is better to keep silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. When used as a response in an argument, “I’m entitled to my opinion” is also a logical fallacy, as it fails to establish whether or not one’s opinion is true or false. I suggested he write his speech on the changed definition of tolerance, which he did, and delivered it. But what does the statement really mean and why is it featured with such predictability when there is a disagreement about things like religion, ethics or politics? I would be fully entitled by law to advocate for my answer as the ‘best’ one, regardless of how strange or convoluted the justification. Is it your view that opinion is all that is possible on this question, meaning there is no correct answer?” These questions are designed to sift what was said from what may have been meant by implication. I will never forget what my Dad told me at a young age, “Being a good leader sometimes means not everyone is going to like or agree with you.” Believing in what you think is right and standing up for your beliefs isn’t always the easy thing to do. It did for me. Died: March 26, 2003. "Everyone is entitled to his own..." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan quotes from ... Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. If we were classmates and our Algebra teacher gave us a really complex problem to solve, and I decided on a whim to choose 77 as my answer (since it’s a biblical number of completion), the fact that my answer differed from that of others would not force us to determine that everyone is equally correct or that the problem has no objective answer. Before entering the NHL, I was lucky enough to play my junior hockey in the Ontario Hockey League for the Peterborough Petes. Put another way, the statement may intend to convey something more like: “You shouldn’t disagree with my view or suggest that it is weak or false.” In declaring that they’re “entitled” to it, they hope to float under the radar something that ordinarily would demand more work from them, which is that others ought to legitimize or give some kind of consent to the position the person is taking. – Why do you presume I don’t think everyone has a right to an opinion? Rarely does anybody challenge the statement, since it seems like an unassailable truth and the person saying it is thought to be speaking form the “high ground” of tolerance or something like it. From that point forward, our runs were no longer done in a pack. I seriously doubt, in other words, that anybody making that case is a closet relativist about doctrine or interpretation. It means you live in a free country, one which does not have a “thought police” making sure everyone adheres to a “party line” dictated from the government. – I honestly don’t know what you were getting at with the last two points, so I’ll leave them alone. Thank God we have both of those thing still. Subscribe to Intellectual Takeout's Daily Digest! Heat, sleet, snow, or rain, we ran. -we are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor 10:5 But in this situation, are you truly helping out your teammates if you have more to give but are settling on mediocrity? This common phrase is an offshoot of the same vein of thinking. Credo House 1209 Cedar Ridge Road However, if you have more to give, and aren’t giving it, how are you doing anyone a favor or being a good teammate? Trust me, it’ll pay off. While I haven’t perused the entire comments section of the post you are talking about, don’t you think that when people argue that in non-essentials there should be leeway for differences, they are not saying or implying that non-essentials are mere matters of preference? Really, why confuse opinion with the facts? And who holds these rights and on what basis? In this post we read that, Don’t be surprised if the person who so casually drops this line about everyone being entitled to their opinion really means to convey the idea that nobody can or should consider another person’s view wrong. We all have our blind spots. Book learning only gets one so far. Just curious as to how you feel reading some of these comments, as they relate to Clint’s post? You can believe that one of the views is the right one (or at least the one most likely to be correct) while ‘entitling’ others to hold one of the other acceptable views. He received his B.A. The “Everyone is entitled to their opinion” mindset is the engine that drives the divide in cultural beliefs. The latter is the type people should probably keep to themselves, but it doesn’t always work that way. No one wanted to get caught by the guy behind them and in turn, everyone chased the guy in front of them. Clint Roberts has taught Philosophy, Religion, Ethics, Critical Thinking, Apologetics, and a few less interesting subjects over the last decade or so. -the word of God is able to judge the thoughts/intentions of the heart. Biography. You can find his academic work at Gen 6:5 You may notice some bugs in submission and user experience. There’s nothing a modern American loves to remind other people of more than his or her “rights”, which often extend to things that are in fact nowhere guaranteed legally. They didn’t want informed opinion, they wanted the radio drama of average people ranting. To say water is the best tasting liquid known to man is opinion, since this cannot be proven objective. I reckon you are right. Significant improvements are coming soon! Proudly created with, © 2018 by Talking Business. The person could mean, for example, only that in this country, presuming it’s the U.S. we’re talking about, liberty of conscience and freedom of thought/speech are granted legally to the citizens. As often as it gets repeated, I don’t think I can recall one time when someone arguing against another’s point of view suggested that he or she did not have the right to hold and express that view. Probably the person means to imply something else, however, and here we have to apply the sniff test, since the thing being implied may not be apparent on the surface. Even physiology is subjective (does everybody you know have the same allergies, or the same metabolism?) Yes, yes, at this point some well-meaning person might quote to us the biblical verse (Ps 8:2) that says “Out of the mouths of babes comes wisdom.” But the actual wording of the passage reads, “Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength,” or in some versions of the New Testament “… perfect praise.”. Maybe a good response in the midst of it would be: Does this issue really have a right or wrong answer, or are we merely looking at a philosophical canvas, commenting on the brush strokes? Sure we’re all free & able to think what we want, and of course our rights as citizens include the holding of whichever opinion we prefer. The following Monday, I decided to break away from the pack. Put another way, the statement may intend to convey something more like: You shouldn’t disagree with my view or suggest that it is weak or false. If by chance the familiar refrain is serving as a way to cast the entire subject under a cloud of relativism, this needs to be made plain and confronted. What does it really mean to say that everyone is entitled to their own opinion? 1 Cor 2 var. and Ph.D. in Systematic Theology from Duquesne University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. – You last paragraph is nonsense, since you are not differentiate between fact and opinion. They had four kids along the way, and later adopted two more humans, a few goats and chickens, and a pony. Either way, ignore one to the exclusion of the other and you’re bound to have a myopic, lopsided worldview that anchors too heavily on the methods and knowledge of either one. Rom 14:5, Sadly, this is often where we hear the Text in 2 Peter 1: 20, and the so-called idea of “private interpretation”. Of course, it’s fine for us to grant that everyone is free to have their own opinion. What is your exact point in that regard? It is an exercise in clarification. It's the only real point in saying it, since everybody already knows they're entitled to their own opinion, so they don't need telling that they are! Conceptual analysis and well thought out, logical beliefs based in analytic philosophy and expressed in clear, precise writing is important, but it’s not the whole picture of what it means to be informed or an intellectual. If “Everyone’s entitled to their opinion” just means no-one has the right to stop people thinking and saying whatever they want, then the statement is true, but fairly trivial. After a short while, I felt I wasn’t giving myself the best version of me. The statement is a decidedly modern one. Sure we’re all free & able to think what we want, and of course our rights as citizens include the holding of whichever opinion we prefer. – You wrote, “You bemoan subjectivism/relativism, but it’s a fact of life that everything is subjective.” In that case this very statement is merely subjective, so I need not believe it. They have a job to do, and someone has to do it. I wasn’t trying to make my teammates look bad, I was simply pushing myself to be better, and maybe, just maybe, someone behind me would see that and realize they had more in them.

Brooke Olzendam Age, Logan Mega Centre, Halftime Speech Snl Peyton Manning, Jingle Bell Rock Chords, Interview With A Vampire Louis Dark Gift, Ben Baker Violin, Spacex Boca Chica Test Schedule,